Latvia Transfer Pricing Policy
Latvia transfer pricing policy – Key Transfer Pricing rules in Latvia, documentation obligations, and compliance expectations under the State Revenue Service (VID).
Please click on each section to expand further:
Introduction to Transfer Pricing in Latvia
Latvia applies the OECD Transfer Pricing guidelines and strictly follows the arm’s-length principle for all related-party transactions. The Latvian State Revenue Service (VID) requires companies to maintain detailed Transfer Pricing documentation to substantiate that pricing between related entities aligns with economic substance. These rules apply to both cross-border and domestic related-party dealings, especially where tax risks may arise. Companies engaging in such transactions must perform functional, comparable, and economic analyses to justify their pricing. Failure to comply can result in tax adjustments, penalties, accrued interest, and ongoing scrutiny from the VID.
Adoption of OECD Transfer Pricing guidelines for consistency with global standards
Documentation must explain:
— Nature of related-party transactions
— Functional, asset, and risk (FAR) analysis
— Method selection and justification
— Benchmarking and economic comparabilityLocal File and Master File requirements apply based on thresholds
Increased compliance expectations for multinational groups operating in Latvia
Mandatory application of the arm’s-length principle for all intra-group transactions
Rules apply to goods, services, financing, intangibles, and cost-sharing arrangements
High-risk areas include:
— Intragroup loans
— Management fees
— Intellectual property and royalty arrangementsThe VID may adjust transactions that do not reflect economic reality
Documentation must be updated annually for material transactions
Latvia’s TP regime is aligned with:
— OECD Guidelines
— EU Transfer Pricing frameworks
— BEPS Action 13 reporting standardsParticipation in EU joint initiatives enhances dispute resolution
Harmonized documentation requirements support cross-border compliance
Alignment ensures consistency for multinational enterprises across EU jurisdictions
Documentation & Regulatory Requirements
Latvia follows OECD BEPS Action Plan requirements, especially BEPS Action 13.
Mandatory arm’s-length principle for all related-party transactions.
Enhanced reporting obligations for multinational groups operating in Latvia.
Tax authority (VID) may adjust taxable income if pricing deviates from arm’s-length standards.
Applicable to multinational groups with consolidated revenue over the global threshold (€750 million).
Primary filing required if the ultimate parent is resident in Latvia.
Latvian entities must notify VID about their reporting obligations and group structure.
CbCR includes global income allocation, taxes paid, and economic activity indicators.
Local File and Master File required when transaction thresholds are met.
Mandatory documentation for:
– Goods and service transactions
– Intercompany loans and guarantees
– Royalty and intangible arrangementsDocumentation must include comparability, functional (FAR) analysis, and benchmarking.
Annual updates needed for material transactions to remain compliant.
Latvia is implementing OECD Pillar 2 Global Minimum Tax rules.
A 15% minimum effective tax rate will apply to large multinational groups.
Increased reporting transparency and additional top-up tax obligations may arise.
Groups operating in Latvia must reassess structures, incentives, and profit allocation.
Transfer Pricing Methods
Used when identical or comparable uncontrolled transactions exist.
Requires reliable market price data from domestic or EU markets.
Latvian tax authority (VID) prefers CUP when high-quality comparables are available.
Often applied in commodity, distribution, and financial transactions.
Applies when a Latvian entity purchases from a related party and resells to independent customers.
Gross margin determined by comparing to independent distributors.
Useful for limited-risk distributors operating in Latvia.
Must reflect local market conditions and industry resale margins.
Used when goods or services are supplied from Latvia to related parties.
Requires identifying direct and indirect costs plus an arm’s-length mark-up.
Frequently applied for contract manufacturing and shared service centers.
Mark-up supported through benchmarking studies under OECD guidelines.
Commonly used where reliable gross margin comparables are limited.
Benchmarking performed using net profit indicators (e.g., EBIT, Berry ratio).
Preferred for service providers, distributors, and manufacturers.
Must use EU comparables where Latvian market data is insufficient.
Used for integrated operations where parties contribute unique intangibles.
Profit allocation based on relative value of functions, assets, and risks.
Suitable for complex value chains such as digital services or R&D collaboration.
Requires robust documentation demonstrating the sharing mechanism.
Analytical & Compliance Support
Identifies suitable independent comparables across Latvia, the Baltics, and wider EU markets.
Adjusts for economic conditions, functional differences, and market-specific factors.
Ensures alignment with OECD Transfer Pricing standards and Latvian tax authority (VID) expectations.
Supports all Transfer Pricing methods, particularly TNMM and Cost Plus analyses.
Evaluates the Functions performed, Assets used, and Risks assumed by Latvian and related-party entities.
Determines the appropriate characterization (e.g., limited-risk distributor, contract manufacturer, service provider).
Forms the basis for selecting the arm’s-length Transfer Pricing method.
Required as part of Latvia’s annual Transfer Pricing documentation obligations.
Trends, Challenges & Real-World Impacts
Increasing scrutiny from the Latvian State Revenue Service (VID), especially regarding intra-group service fees and management charges.
Difficulty in finding suitable local comparables due to Latvia’s smaller market size.
Pressure on multinational groups to justify margins for limited-risk entities operating in Latvia.
Heightened documentation expectations aligned with OECD Transfer Pricing guidelines.
Growing adoption of OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines as Kosovo continues integrating international best practices.
Rising importance of Transfer Pricing documentation consistency—Master File, Local File, and economic analysis.
Increased scrutiny of intra-group services, requiring companies to prove benefit tests and arm’s-length pricing.
Greater attention on financial transactions, including intercompany loans and guarantees.
Movement toward regional harmonization in the Western Balkans to reduce cross-border pricing inconsistencies.
Recent legislative updates enhancing Transfer Pricing documentation thresholds and penalties.
VID issuing more guidance on intra-group services, cost allocation, and proof of benefit tests.
Expansion of cooperative compliance programs to encourage early disclosure and risk reduction.
New regional case studies shaping best practices within the Baltic markets.
Economic shifts within the EU affecting profitability benchmarks and arm’s-length margin ranges.
Global supply chain disruptions requiring revisited Transfer Pricing adjustments for Latvian distributors and manufacturers.
Increased focus on digital services and cross-border IP arrangements amid evolving international tax rules.
Geopolitical impacts raising scrutiny over cross-border funding, pricing of goods, and risk allocation.
Use Cases by Business Size & Industry
Early-stage Latvian companies often rely on cross-border support from parent entities, requiring clear justification of service fees and cost allocations.
Startups operating in IT, SaaS, and digital services must navigate Transfer Pricing rules related to intangibles and IP development.
Limited local comparables result in reliance on Baltic or EU benchmarking sets for arm’s-length pricing.
Proper functional analysis is essential due to rapidly evolving business models common in early-stage Latvian tech companies.
Latvian SMEs engaged in regional trade with Lithuania, Estonia, or EU affiliates must document margins and pricing to meet VID requirements.
Common SME challenges include proving economic substance and demonstrating the benefit of intra-group services.
SMEs often use TNMM due to simplicity and broader access to regional comparables.
Strengthening Transfer Pricing governance helps Latvian SMEs reduce audit risks and maintain stable cross-border relationships.
Dispute Resolution & Advance Agreements
Latvia allows taxpayers to request an APA to obtain certainty on Transfer Pricing positions for future transactions.
APAs are typically most useful for companies with recurring, high-value intra-group transactions or complex IP arrangements.
The Latvian State Revenue Service (VID) evaluates the proposed methodology to ensure alignment with OECD guidelines.
APAs help reduce audit risks by providing upfront agreement on pricing methods and comparables.
Latvian taxpayers are encouraged to maintain robust Transfer Pricing documentation to minimize audit exposure.
Early engagement with VID—such as pre-audit consultations—can prevent escalating disputes.
Ensuring consistency between financial statements, TP documentation, and intercompany agreements supports credible compliance.
Multinational groups benefit from proactively addressing grey areas, especially around management fees, financial transactions, and shared services.
Clear, Competitive Packages Tailored for Your Transfer Pricing Needs
Basic Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
Standard Transfer Pricing Study
Premium Transfer Pricing Study
Experienced Transfer Pricing Advisors at Your Service
OECD Transfer Pricing-Country-Profile Lativa
This is general information only and not professional advice. Consult a professional before acting.