Romania Transfer Pricing Policy
Romania transfer pricing policy – Key Transfer Pricing rules in Romania, documentation obligations, and compliance expectations under the National Agency for Fiscal Administration (ANAF).
Please click on each section to expand further:
Introduction to Transfer Pricing in Romania
Transfer Pricing regulations in Romania are designed to ensure that transactions between related parties are conducted at arm’s length and reflect economic substance. Administered by the Romanian tax authorities (ANAF), the regime applies to both domestic and cross-border related-party transactions. Romania follows an OECD-aligned Transfer Pricing framework, with strong audit focus on documentation quality, functional analysis, and consistency between Transfer Pricing policies and actual business conduct.
Romania applies the arm’s-length principle to transactions between related parties.
Transfer Pricing analysis must assess functions performed, assets employed, and risks assumed.
Both traditional transaction methods and profit-based methods are accepted.
Comparability analysis must consider contractual terms, economic circumstances, and business strategies.
Consistency between Transfer Pricing policies and actual conduct is essential.
Romania’s Transfer Pricing rules are embedded in the Fiscal Code and secondary regulations.
The policy applies to domestic and cross-border related-party transactions.
Taxpayers meeting threshold criteria are required to prepare Local File documentation.
Transactions involving services, financing, and intangibles receive increased scrutiny.
Penalties may apply for non-compliance, incomplete documentation, or inaccurate reporting.
Romania’s Transfer Pricing framework is aligned with OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.
BEPS principles influence enforcement, with emphasis on transparency and substance-over-form.
Master File and Country-by-Country Reporting concepts are integrated into the compliance regime.
Romanian tax authorities participate in international information-exchange mechanisms.
Alignment between global Transfer Pricing policies and Romania-specific documentation is critical to manage audit risk.
Documentation & Regulatory Requirements
Romania’s Transfer Pricing framework is aligned with OECD BEPS principles and substance-over-form concepts.
Taxpayers must demonstrate that profits align with value creation and actual economic activity.
Accurate delineation of controlled transactions is required, supported by robust FAR analysis.
Romanian tax authorities closely scrutinise intra-group services, financing, and intangible transactions.
BEPS-driven enforcement has increased audit intensity and documentation expectations.
Multinational groups meeting global revenue thresholds are subject to CbCR obligations impacting Romanian entities.
CbCR data is used by ANAF for high-level risk assessment and audit selection.
Inconsistencies between CbCR data, Local File, Master File, and statutory accounts may trigger audits.
Alignment between global reporting and Romanian operational substance is critical.
Coordination with the ultimate parent entity is required to ensure timely and accurate reporting.
Taxpayers must maintain contemporaneous Transfer Pricing documentation, including Local File requirements.
Documentation must clearly explain transaction structures, pricing methodologies, and economic rationale.
Files must be available upon request during tax audits conducted by ANAF.
Non-compliance may result in penalties, pricing adjustments, and extended audit proceedings.
Continuous monitoring is essential due to Romania’s increasing Transfer Pricing enforcement activity.
OECD Pillar 2 introduces a global minimum tax framework affecting multinational groups with Romanian operations.
Transfer Pricing outcomes directly influence effective tax rate calculations under Pillar 2 rules.
Romanian entities may face additional group-level data collection and reporting requirements.
Misalignment between Transfer Pricing policies and Pillar 2 computations increases compliance risk.
Proactive assessment is necessary to manage interaction between Romanian TP rules and global minimum tax obligations.
Transfer Pricing Methods
The Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method compares prices charged in controlled transactions with those between independent parties.
CUP is commonly applied in Romania for commodities, financial transactions, and standardized goods or services.
A high level of comparability is required with respect to product characteristics, contractual terms, and market conditions.
Adjustments may be necessary for volume, timing, geographic differences, and credit terms.
Romanian tax authorities prefer CUP where reliable internal or external comparables are available.
The Resale Minus Method determines arm’s-length pricing by deducting an appropriate gross margin from the resale price to third parties.
It is frequently used for distribution and trading entities operating in Romania.
The selected gross margin must reflect the distributor’s functions, assets employed, and risks assumed.
Comparable margins are typically sourced from EU or regional benchmark databases.
The method may be challenged where distributors perform significant value-adding activities.
The Cost Plus Method applies an arm’s-length markup to costs incurred by a related-party supplier.
It is commonly used for manufacturing, contract services, and shared service arrangements in Romania.
The cost base must be clearly defined, consistently applied, and properly documented.
Markups must align with the functional and risk profile of the tested party.
Romanian tax authorities closely scrutinise cost allocation mechanisms and markup justification.
The Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) evaluates net profitability relative to an appropriate base such as costs, sales, or assets.
TNMM is widely applied in Romania due to limited availability of reliable gross-margin comparables.
The tested party is typically the least complex entity involved in the transaction.
Profit level indicators must be consistent with FAR analysis and economic substance.
Authorities expect consistency between TNMM results, Transfer Pricing documentation, and statutory accounts.
The Profit Split Method allocates combined profits among related parties based on their relative contributions to value creation.
It is suitable for highly integrated operations or transactions involving unique or valuable intangibles.
Reliable identification of combined profits and appropriate allocation keys is essential.
This method may be relevant for R&D-intensive, IP-driven, or integrated manufacturing structures.
Romanian tax authorities closely examine profit split arrangements to ensure alignment with actual functions, assets, and risks.
Analytical & Compliance Support
Romania relies primarily on EU and regional comparable databases due to limited availability of domestic comparables.
Selected comparables must closely match the tested party’s functional profile, asset base, and risk assumption.
Adjustments for working capital, market size, geographic factors, and capacity utilisation are often required.
Romanian tax authorities expect transparent benchmarking methodologies with clear justification for inclusion or exclusion of comparables.
Benchmarking outcomes must align with the selected Transfer Pricing method and the economic substance of Romanian operations.
A robust Functions, Assets, and Risks (FAR) analysis is essential to determine the true economic role of Romanian entities within multinational groups.
Romania’s business environment requires detailed assessment of operational assets in manufacturing, shared services, IT, logistics, and distribution activities.
The analysis must clearly distinguish contractual arrangements from actual conduct, particularly in centralized or regional hub structures.
Risk assessment should cover market risk, operational risk, financing risk, and regulatory risk.
Romanian tax authorities rely heavily on FAR analysis to validate entity characterisation, including limited-risk distributors, contract manufacturers, shared service providers, and principal entities.
Trends, Challenges & Real-World Impacts
Increasing frequency and depth of Transfer Pricing audits create higher compliance pressure.
Strong scrutiny of intra-group services, management fees, and financing arrangements.
Limited availability of high-quality local comparables increases reliance on EU benchmarking.
Substance-versus-contract mismatches are a common audit trigger.
Prolonged audits may result in adjustments, penalties, and dispute escalation.
Greater focus on economic substance and alignment with value creation.
Increased use of EU and regional comparable data sets.
Heightened attention on consistency between Local File, Master File, and financial statements.
Growing scrutiny of cost allocations and shared service arrangements.
Increased examination of business restructurings and functional changes.
Romanian tax authorities continue to intensify Transfer Pricing audits across key sectors.
Increased focus on benchmarking quality and FAR analysis robustness.
Enhanced scrutiny of cross-border services and financing transactions.
Ongoing alignment with OECD and EU Transfer Pricing developments.
Expanded cooperation with other EU tax authorities through information exchange.
Inflationary pressures affect cost bases, margins, and markup sustainability.
Supply-chain disruptions influence pricing for manufacturing and logistics transactions.
Energy and input cost volatility impacts profitability and risk allocation analyses.
EU regulatory developments increase documentation and consistency expectations.
Macroeconomic uncertainty heightens audit sensitivity and risk assessment.
Use Cases by Business Size & Industry
Startups engaging in related-party transactions must establish arm’s-length pricing frameworks at an early stage.
Early Transfer Pricing policies help define intra-group services, IP ownership, and cost-sharing arrangements.
Proportionate and simplified documentation supports compliance while limiting administrative burden.
Startups in technology, IT services, shared services, and manufacturing benefit from early FAR alignment.
Forward-looking Transfer Pricing planning supports scalability, investor confidence, and cross-border expansion.
SMEs frequently engage in related-party services, procurement, distribution, or financing transactions.
Transfer Pricing documentation helps SMEs demonstrate arm’s-length pricing during tax audits.
Simplified benchmarking approaches are often appropriate given transaction size and complexity.
Clear FAR analysis reduces the risk of adjustments and penalties during ANAF reviews.
Consistent Transfer Pricing practices support sustainable growth and regulatory certainty.
Dispute Resolution & Advance Agreements
Romania allows Advance Pricing Agreements to provide certainty on Transfer Pricing methodologies for covered related-party transactions.
APAs may be unilateral, bilateral, or multilateral, subject to approval by the Romanian tax authorities (ANAF).
They are commonly used for long-term arrangements involving manufacturing, shared services, financing, and intangibles.
Robust FAR analysis, reliable benchmarking, and clear transaction delineation are essential for successful APA applications.
APAs help reduce audit exposure, disputes, and volatility in tax outcomes over the agreed period.
Proactive Transfer Pricing planning and contemporaneous documentation are key to avoiding disputes.
Consistency between Local File, Master File, benchmarking analyses, and statutory accounts reduces audit risk.
Transparent pricing methodologies strengthen credibility during ANAF audits and reviews.
Clear documentation of risk allocation and economic rationale supports smoother audit discussions.
Periodic reviews and updates help prevent disputes as business models and market conditions evolve.
Clear, Competitive Packages Tailored for Your Transfer Pricing Needs
Basic Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
Standard Transfer Pricing Study
Premium Transfer Pricing Study
Experienced Transfer Pricing Advisors at Your Service
OECD Transfer Pricing-Country-Profile Romania
This is general information only and not professional advice. Consult a professional before acting.