Tunisia Transfer Pricing Policy
Tunisia transfer pricing policy – Key Transfer Pricing rules in Tunisia, documentation obligations, and compliance expectations under the Tunisian Tax Administration (Direction Générale des Impôts – DGI).
Please click on each section to expand further:
Introduction to Transfer Pricing in Tunisia
Tunisia has introduced a structured Transfer Pricing framework aligned with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, requiring related-party transactions to be conducted in accordance with the arm’s length principle. The Tunisian tax authorities increasingly scrutinize intercompany transactions, particularly cross-border dealings involving services, financing, and intellectual property. Taxpayers engaging in related-party transactions are expected to maintain robust Transfer Pricing documentation to support pricing policies and mitigate audit and adjustment risks.
Governed under Tunisian tax legislation and regulations
OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines used as the primary reference
Applies to transactions between associated enterprises
Tax authorities may adjust taxable income for non-arm’s length pricing
Emphasis on economic substance and commercial rationale
Mandatory application of the arm’s length principle
Strong focus on Functions, Assets, and Risks (FAR) analysis
Accepted Transfer Pricing methods include:
Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP)
Resale Minus Method
Cost Plus Method
Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)
Profit Split Method
Selection of the most appropriate method must be justified
Contemporaneous documentation is expected upon request
Tunisia aligns its Transfer Pricing framework with OECD standards
Incorporates OECD BEPS principles into enforcement practices
Increasing focus on transparency and information exchange
Coordination with tax treaty partners for cross-border matters
Supports dispute resolution through treaty-based mechanisms
Documentation & Regulatory Requirements
Tunisia has incorporated OECD BEPS principles into its Transfer Pricing framework
Strong focus on preventing base erosion and profit shifting
Emphasis on economic substance over legal form
Increased scrutiny of:
Cross-border services and management fees
Financing arrangements and interest charges
Transactions involving intangibles
Tax authorities may recharacterize non-arm’s length arrangements
Applies to multinational groups meeting OECD revenue thresholds
Filing obligations apply to:
Ultimate parent entities resident in Tunisia, or
Designated surrogate entities
CbCR includes:
Global allocation of income and taxes
Employees and business activities by jurisdiction
Information exchanged under international tax cooperation frameworks
Penalties may apply for non-compliance or late submission
Maintenance of Transfer Pricing documentation is mandatory
Documentation must be contemporaneous and transaction-specific
Typical documentation includes:
FAR analysis
Transfer Pricing method selection
Benchmarking and comparability analysis
Documentation must be provided upon request during tax audits
Weak or missing documentation increases adjustment and penalty risk
Tunisia is monitoring developments under OECD Pillar 2 Global Minimum Tax
Potential future impact on large multinational groups operating in Tunisia
May introduce additional data and reporting requirements
Increased interaction between Transfer Pricing outcomes and global tax calculations
Multinationals encouraged to assess Pillar 2 exposure proactively
Transfer Pricing Methods
Compares prices in controlled transactions with independent market prices
Preferred where reliable internal or external comparables are available
Commonly applied to:
Import and export of goods
Intercompany financing and interest rates
Royalties and licensing arrangements
Requires high degree of comparability
Adjustments may be required for contractual or market differences
Starts with resale price to an independent customer
Deducts an arm’s length gross margin
Suitable for:
Distribution and trading entities
Buy-sell arrangements with limited risks
Requires reliable gross margin benchmarking
Less appropriate where significant value-added functions are performed
Applies an arm’s length mark-up to direct and indirect costs
Commonly used for:
Intra-group services
Manufacturing and processing activities
Requires clear definition of cost base
Mark-up must be supported by comparable data
Examines net profit relative to an appropriate base
Most frequently applied method in Tunisia
Suitable for:
Routine service providers
Contract manufacturers
Limited-risk distributors
Relies on regional or international comparable data
Careful selection of profit level indicator is essential
Allocates combined profits among related parties
Applied where transactions are highly integrated
Appropriate for:
Unique and valuable intangibles
Complex, interdependent business models
Requires detailed contribution and value-creation analysis
Subject to higher scrutiny by Tunisian tax authorities
Analytical & Compliance Support
Tunisia’s regulations align with OECD standards for comparability.
Local data is favored but regional and international comparables are acceptable when local data is not available.
Key adjustments may be required for differences in market conditions, contract terms, and functional profiles.
Comparability analysis must be comprehensive, with consistent methodology and clear assumptions.
Tax authorities expect full transparency in screening criteria, data sources, and benchmarking logic.
Functional, asset, and risk (FAR) analysis is a core part of Transfer Pricing compliance.
Local tax authorities require a clear delineation of the economic roles and responsibilities of each entity in the supply chain.
Risk-adjusted returns must be identified for each party, accounting for operational, financial, and regulatory risks.
Special attention is given to intangibles, financing structures, and the allocation of risks.
Benchmarking should reflect the economic substance of transactions, not just the contractual terms.
Trends, Challenges & Real-World Impacts
Local data limitations can make comparability analysis difficult.
The tax authority’s scrutiny on pricing methods is intensifying, particularly regarding intangibles and financing arrangements.
The lack of clarity around certain cross-border transactions increases uncertainty for taxpayers.
There is a growing need for local adjustments in benchmarking due to changing market conditions and tax rates.
Firms are facing a higher compliance burden to align with OECD guidelines and local rules.
Increased focus on the documentation of intercompany transactions, with particular attention to intellectual property and financing arrangements.
The adoption of OECD guidelines continues to shape the overall tax policy.
Digital economy regulations are evolving, affecting transfer pricing for tech and e-commerce companies.
Tax audit activity has intensified, with greater emphasis on value chain analysis.
The government is keen on ensuring that profit allocations match economic substance.
New reforms are expected to be implemented to enhance international tax compliance.
Tunisia has committed to enhancing digitalization of its tax processes to improve transparency.
Recent regulatory changes are focused on strengthening compliance with OECD recommendations.
There are ongoing discussions about expanding automatic exchange of information regarding cross-border transactions.
A shift towards digital services taxation is influencing the way tax authorities evaluate intercompany transactions.
Global tax reform initiatives (like Pillar 2) are expected to affect Tunisia’s tax policies.
The growing economic instability in the region could result in more frequent tax audits.
Cross-border M&A activity is seeing more emphasis on compliance with local transfer pricing rules.
Increased enforcement is being reported, especially for large, multinationals with complex structures.
The evolution of digital taxation is posing challenges for firms operating in the tech industry.
Use Cases by Business Size & Industry
Startups in Tunisia may face challenges in meeting documentation requirements due to resource constraints.
The focus on innovation often requires transfer pricing policies that handle intangible assets like intellectual property and R&D.
As startups scale, they must align intercompany transactions with local tax policies to avoid audit risks.
Funding arrangements and cross-border transactions may involve complex transfer pricing analysis, especially for early-stage companies raising capital.
There is growing support for startups to engage with tax authorities proactively to ensure compliance with evolving OECD standards.
SMEs in Tunisia often need to navigate local transfer pricing laws to maintain compliance while managing costs.
The documentary burden can be significant, and many SMEs may face challenges in developing robust transfer pricing policies.
SMEs are increasingly exposed to international trade and cross-border transactions, making it crucial to adopt effective transfer pricing strategies.
They may require simplified documentation that aligns with the local tax authority’s expectations, especially for businesses operating in manufacturing and services sectors.
As the international OECD guidelines evolve, SMEs need to adapt their strategies to ensure compliance, particularly for multinational operations.
Dispute Resolution & Advance Agreements
Tunisia offers Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) to establish upfront clarity on transfer pricing methods and intercompany pricing strategies.
APAs are typically used for cross-border transactions involving multiple related parties, ensuring that the pricing approach aligns with OECD guidelines.
Businesses operating in manufacturing, services, or intangible assets sectors may find APAs beneficial for mitigating audit risks.
The process involves a detailed review by Tunisia’s tax authorities and third-party auditors, and the agreement is typically valid for 3-5 years.
Rulings on APAs can provide certainty for businesses engaged in complex transactions, such as intercompany financing or IP licensing.
Tunisia encourages dispute avoidance through open communication between businesses and tax authorities, especially for cross-border intercompany transactions.
Businesses must ensure their documentation meets the Transfer Pricing guidelines to avoid misunderstandings or disputes over pricing policies.
Tunisia’s tax authorities emphasize mutual agreements and advance rulings to clarify transfer pricing matters, particularly when transactions involve foreign subsidiaries.
The dispute resolution process typically includes negotiation, followed by potential mediation if an agreement cannot be reached.
Ensuring that tax returns align with the latest OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines helps minimize disputes and strengthens compliance.
Clear, Competitive Packages Tailored for Your Transfer Pricing Needs
Basic Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
Standard Transfer Pricing Study
Premium Transfer Pricing Study
Experienced Transfer Pricing Advisors at Your Service
OECD Transfer Pricing-Country-Profile Tunisia
This is general information only and not professional advice. Consult a professional before acting.