Ukraine Transfer Pricing Policy
Ukraine transfer pricing policy – Key Transfer Pricing rules in Ukraine, documentation obligations, and compliance expectations under the State Tax Service of Ukraine.
Please click on each section to expand further:
Introduction to Transfer Pricing in Ukraine
Transfer Pricing (TP) in Ukraine follows international standards, particularly the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. The country has adopted a robust regulatory framework for TP to ensure compliance with global tax norms and to prevent base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Ukraine’s approach to transfer pricing applies to both multinational companies and local entities involved in cross-border transactions.
Transfer pricing in Ukraine is governed by the Tax Code, which incorporates OECD principles and requires transactions between related parties to be priced according to the arm’s length principle.
The Ukrainian tax authority has the right to adjust taxable income if transactions do not align with the arm’s length standard.
Documentation requirements are stringent, with businesses required to submit detailed TP reports annually.
Ukraine’s regulations cover a wide range of business activities, including the sale of goods, services, and intangible assets.
Functional and economic analyses are required to justify the transfer pricing methods applied in intercompany transactions.
Ukraine’s tax authority (State Tax Service of Ukraine) enforces TP rules and audits multinational companies for compliance.
Companies must prepare and maintain documentation on intercompany transactions, which includes detailed reports and justifications for pricing.
The government has implemented BEPS measures to prevent tax avoidance, including increased transparency and reporting requirements for multinational enterprises.
Ukraine’s TP regulations also focus on ensuring the alignment of profits with the economic activities and risks of each entity involved in a transaction.
Businesses must adhere to strict timelines for submitting TP documentation to avoid penalties or adjustments.
Ukraine aligns its TP policies with international standards, particularly the OECD’s BEPS framework, ensuring consistency with global tax norms.
The country participates in global efforts to combat tax avoidance through profit shifting and aggressive tax planning.
International tax treaties help resolve cross-border TP disputes, with the potential for mutual agreement procedures (MAP).
Ukraine actively monitors and adjusts its regulations in line with evolving global standards to ensure fairness and transparency in tax matters.
Documentation & Regulatory Requirements
Ukraine follows OECD’s BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) guidelines for transfer pricing.
The primary goal is to prevent tax avoidance and ensure that profits are taxed where economic activities take place.
Transfer pricing rules align with international standards, ensuring fair allocation of income and taxes.
Ukraine requires businesses to adjust pricing methods if they deviate from the arm’s length principle.
BEPS implementation in Ukraine ensures multinational corporations report tax arrangements transparently.
CbCR is required for multinational enterprises (MNEs) with annual consolidated revenues exceeding a set threshold.
The report must include financial and tax information by jurisdiction, such as profits, taxes paid, and employees.
CbCR aims to enhance tax transparency and assist tax authorities in identifying risks related to transfer pricing.
Ukraine requires MNEs to file CbCR annually with the tax authorities, which are shared with other jurisdictions through automatic exchange.
Non-compliance with CbCR regulations may result in penalties and increased scrutiny from Ukrainian tax authorities.
Ukraine mandates businesses to maintain detailed transfer pricing documentation for intercompany transactions.
Documentation must justify that prices align with the arm’s length principle, especially for cross-border transactions.
Failure to comply with Ukrainian transfer pricing regulations can result in penalties, tax reassessments, and adjustments.
The tax authorities in Ukraine require taxpayers to submit documentation upon request, ensuring proper compliance.
Taxpayers must also prepare an annual report outlining their transfer pricing methodology and compliance efforts.
Ukraine has adopted OECD’s Pillar 2 framework, which ensures that multinational companies pay a global minimum tax.
Pillar 2 aims to address global tax challenges, especially in light of shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions.
The implementation of Pillar 2 will affect transfer pricing calculations and the tax liability of multinational firms in Ukraine.
Ukraine’s tax system will enforce minimum tax rates, impacting cross-border transactions and pricing strategies.
The new rules under Pillar 2 are expected to increase compliance costs for businesses, but they ensure a fairer global tax environment.
Transfer Pricing Methods
The Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method is used when pricing transactions between related parties by comparing them with prices in uncontrolled transactions.
This method requires a careful selection of comparable transactions in terms of product type, terms, and market conditions.
It is primarily used for transactions involving tangible goods, where reliable market data is available.
Taxpayers must justify the selection of comparable transactions, and any material differences must be accounted for in the pricing.
The CUP method provides a robust method for establishing arm’s length pricing in Ukraine.
The Resale Minus method is used when goods are purchased and resold with little modification, focusing on the resale price.
The method calculates the resale price and subtracts an appropriate gross margin to determine the arm’s length price.
This method is suitable for distributors who resell goods but do not engage in significant value-added activities.
The appropriate margin must be based on comparable industry data or similar transactions.
In Ukraine, this method is often used for pricing transactions involving distribution companies.
The Cost Plus method is used when goods or services are sold with significant value-added activities, such as manufacturing.
The selling price is determined by adding an appropriate markup to the cost of production or service provision.
This method is particularly useful for intercompany manufacturing transactions, where costs can be clearly attributed.
The markup should reflect the functions performed, risks assumed, and the assets used by the seller.
In Ukraine, this method is widely accepted for pricing transactions involving production or service provision.
TNMM in Ukraine
The Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) compares the net profit margin earned by a taxpayer in a controlled transaction with that of independent entities.
This method is used when there is insufficient data for applying the CUP method or when the comparables for other methods are limited.
The net margin is calculated based on factors such as sales, assets, or costs.
TNMM is widely used in Ukraine when other methods are not applicable, particularly for distribution or low-risk functions.
Businesses must provide adequate evidence that their chosen net margin is appropriate and comparable to independent entities.
The Profit Split method is used for highly integrated transactions, where both parties contribute significantly to value creation.
The total profit from a transaction is split based on the economic contributions of each party, such as intangible assets or shared risks.
This method is commonly used for joint ventures or transactions involving valuable intellectual property.
In Ukraine, businesses must thoroughly document the value contributed by each party to justify the profit split.
The method requires a comprehensive analysis of the functions, risks, and assets of each participant in the transaction.
Analytical & Compliance Support
Comparability analysis is essential for evaluating whether intercompany transactions align with the arm’s length principle.
Ukraine requires a detailed assessment of the functions, risks, and assets of each party involved in the transaction.
Reliable comparables must be identified from the market to ensure accurate pricing.
Adjustments may be necessary for differences in contractual terms, market conditions, or the functions performed.
Documentation of comparables and adjustments must be thorough to comply with Ukrainian tax regulations.
The FAR (Function, Asset, Risk) analysis is critical for understanding the economic roles of entities involved in intercompany transactions.
This analysis identifies how functions are performed, assets are used, and risks are assumed, which is crucial for determining arm’s length prices.
Ukrainian tax authorities require a detailed FAR analysis to justify profit allocation across related entities.
This analysis helps to ensure that the transfer pricing reflects the actual economic contributions of each party.
Key factors such as operational risks, market risks, and intangible assets must be carefully assessed during the FAR analysis.
Trends, Challenges & Real-World Impacts
Adherence to complex international standards, particularly OECD and BEPS regulations.
The lack of sufficient comparable data, especially in industries with fewer market transactions.
Managing cross-border compliance with different tax regulations and reporting requirements.
Frequent updates in transfer pricing laws create uncertainty and require constant monitoring.
The increasing focus on documentation and transparency can strain resources, particularly for SMEs.
Rising focus on digital economy taxation and the allocation of profits related to intangible assets.
Growing implementation of OECD’s BEPS 2.0 framework to address profit shifting and tax base erosion.
Increased scrutiny from tax authorities globally, requiring businesses to ensure their transfer pricing policies are robust.
The shift towards simplified compliance methods for smaller enterprises to ease their reporting burdens.
More emphasis on ensuring the consistency of transfer pricing with economic substance, particularly in the context of global value chains.
Recent amendments to Ukrainian transfer pricing rules to align with global BEPS standards.
The Ukrainian tax authority has ramped up audits of multinational enterprises to ensure compliance.
New guidelines on the application of the CUP and TNMM methods in Ukraine’s transfer pricing regulations.
Ukraine is preparing for further integration of digital services tax in relation to transfer pricing for tech companies.
Updates on penalties for non-compliance and increased reporting requirements for MNEs in Ukraine.
Ongoing geopolitical instability has impacted cross-border transactions and transfer pricing strategies in Ukraine.
Economic disruptions due to external factors, such as trade tariffs or sanctions, are reshaping multinational firms’ transfer pricing approaches.
The global shift towards global minimum tax rates under Pillar 2 affects Ukraine’s tax policy and business strategies.
Adjustments in transfer pricing methods due to changes in market conditions and asset valuations.
Tax authorities in Ukraine continue to refine the interpretation of BEPS measures, influencing multinational companies’ risk profiles.
Use Cases by Business Size & Industry
Startups in Ukraine face challenges in implementing transfer pricing compliance due to limited financial resources and operational complexity.
Simplified documentation and reporting methods are often encouraged to ease the burden on new businesses.
Startups must still adhere to the arm’s length principle and ensure that their pricing for related-party transactions is justified.
Basic transfer pricing methods such as the Cost Plus or Resale Minus method can be suitable for pricing intercompany transactions in startups.
The Ukrainian tax authorities require startups to maintain proper records and, in certain cases, may grant flexibility for early-stage businesses.
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Ukraine face increased scrutiny from tax authorities but may benefit from simplified compliance requirements.
SMEs should focus on cost-effective transfer pricing methods that reflect their limited resources, such as the Cost Plus method.
The Ukrainian tax authority expects SMEs to provide proper documentation and ensure that intercompany transactions align with the arm’s length principle.
To minimize risk, SMEs must stay up-to-date with local transfer pricing regulations and ensure compliance with annual reporting requirements.
SMEs in Ukraine may also benefit from the use of local comparables in their transfer pricing analysis to justify their pricing structures.
Dispute Resolution & Advance Agreements
APAs in Ukraine are formal agreements between taxpayers and the tax authorities to determine transfer pricing policies for future transactions.
They offer certainty by ensuring that pricing methods for intercompany transactions are approved in advance, thus reducing the risk of tax adjustments.
APAs can be unilateral, bilateral, or multilateral, involving Ukraine and one or more foreign tax jurisdictions.
The process of applying for an APA requires detailed documentation, including a clear description of the business model and pricing methodologies.
APAs provide a valuable tool for multinational businesses operating in Ukraine to avoid disputes and minimize tax risks.
Dispute avoidance involves proactive compliance with transfer pricing regulations to prevent issues with Ukrainian tax authorities.
Maintaining comprehensive transfer pricing documentation, including functional analyses and economic justifications for pricing methods, is key to preventing disputes.
Engaging early with tax authorities and applying for APAs can help businesses avoid conflicts over transfer pricing adjustments.
Clear and transparent intercompany pricing policies are essential to prevent misunderstandings or discrepancies that could lead to audits or penalties.
Ukraine offers mechanisms like mutual agreement procedures (MAP) under international treaties to resolve cross-border transfer pricing disputes.
Clear, Competitive Packages Tailored for Your Transfer Pricing Needs
Basic Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
Standard Transfer Pricing Study
Premium Transfer Pricing Study
Experienced Transfer Pricing Advisors at Your Service
OECD Transfer Pricing-Country-Profile Ukraine
This is general information only and not professional advice. Consult a professional before acting.