Bosnia and Herzegovina Transfer Pricing Policy
Bosnia and Herzegovina transfer pricing policy – Key Transfer Pricing rules in Bosnia and Herzegovina, documentation obligations, and compliance expectations under the Indirect Taxation Authority and relevant Entity Tax Administrations.
Please click on each section to expand further:
Introduction to Transfer Pricing in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina applies Transfer Pricing rules primarily to ensure that related-party transactions are conducted at arm’s length. Although the framework is still developing compared to EU jurisdictions, the tax authorities are increasingly aligning with OECD standards—especially for cross-border transactions involving goods, services, financing, and intellectual property. The country’s Transfer Pricing landscape is characterized by rules that apply to resident taxpayers engaged in transactions with both domestic and foreign related parties, supported by mandatory documentation requirements to justify pricing positions. At the same time, authorities are intensifying their focus on Transfer Pricing audits due to rising revenue pressures.
The fundamentals of TP in Bosnia and Herzegovina rest on three pillars:
- Adoption of the OECD Arm’s Length Principle
- Bosnia and Herzegovina follows the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines as a benchmark for determining acceptable pricing.
- Requirement for TP Documentation
Taxpayers must prepare:
- Local File (transaction-level detail)
- Master File (group-level information)
- The documentation must include:
- functional analysis,
- industry overview,
- benchmarking,
- intercompany contract details,
- financial analysis.
- Accepted Transfer Pricing Methods
The tax authority recognizes standard OECD methods such as:
- CUP
- Resale Minus
- Cost Plus
- TNMM
- Profit Split
Selection depends on transaction type, availability of data, and functional profile.
The fundamentals of TP in Bosnia and Herzegovina rest on three pillars:
- Adoption of the OECD Arm’s Length Principle
- Bosnia and Herzegovina follows the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines as a benchmark for determining acceptable pricing.
- Requirement for TP Documentation
Taxpayers must prepare:
- Local File (transaction-level detail)
- Master File (group-level information)
- The documentation must include:
- functional analysis,
- industry overview,
- benchmarking,
- intercompany contract details,
- financial analysis.
- Accepted Transfer Pricing Methods
- The tax authority recognizes standard OECD methods such as:
- CUP
- Resale Minus
- Cost Plus
- TNMM
- Profit Split
Selection depends on transaction type, availability of data, and functional profile.
Bosnia and Herzegovina continues to strengthen its alignment with international standards through:
- OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines
- Used as the interpretive baseline for audits and documentation.
- Availability of double tax treaties
Although limited compared to Western Europe, Bosnia has treaties with:
- many EU states,
- regional countries,
- key global partners.
These treaties support:
- the arm’s length principle,
- the mutual agreement procedure (MAP),
- elimination of double taxation.
- Engagement in global taxation reforms
Bosnia is gradually working towards compliance with BEPS standards, including:
- transparency,
- documentation,
- substance-based requirements.
Documentation & Regulatory Requirements
Bosnia and Herzegovina is gradually integrating BEPS principles into its tax framework, even though it is not an OECD member. The country applies BEPS-aligned concepts through domestic legislation and international treaty commitments.
Key BEPS-Aligned Practices
- Adoption of the arm’s length principle across both entities—FBiH and Republika Srpska
- Requirement to maintain Local File & Master File
- Emphasis on transparent intercompany dealings
- Scrutiny on profit shifting through:
- management fees,
- intra-group services,
- financing arrangements,
- IP migration or licensing.
- High BEPS Risk Sectors
- Manufacturing (automotive, machinery, metal)
- Pharmaceuticals
- Logistics and transport
- Energy and natural resources
Tax authorities increasingly target low-substance or high-margin entities for BEPS-related adjustments.
Bosnia and Herzegovina does not yet have a full CbCR regime, but follows OECD transparency standards through:
- CbCR Requirements
- CbCR applies only when a multinational group is obligated under:
- the laws of the parent company’s jurisdiction, AND
- Bosnia receives the report through exchange-of-information treaties.
- Local subsidiaries must confirm whether their group is subject to CbCR elsewhere.
- Local Notification
- Bosnian entities may need to declare:
- the reporting entity,
- the jurisdiction filing the CbCR,
- confirmation of filing deadlines.
While domestic CbCR law is still evolving, Bosnia increasingly enforces transparency obligations during audits.
Transfer Pricing compliance obligations are developing but strictly enforced where implemented.
Core Compliance Requirements
- Annual Transfer Pricing Documentation
- Demonstration of arm’s length pricing
- Use of OECD-aligned TP methods
- Disclosure of related-party transactions in the annual tax return
- Documentation Must Include
- Industry and business overview
- Detailed functional (FAR) analysis
- Description of controlled transactions
- Economic analysis and benchmarking
- Intercompany agreements
- Penalties for Non-Compliance
- Tax adjustments to income
- Disallowance of expenses
- Retroactive interest
- Administrative penalties for missing documentation
- Bosnia and Herzegovina’s TP compliance expectations are rising steadily due to greater audit activity.
As a non-EU country, Bosnia and Herzegovina has not yet implemented Pillar 2 (Global Minimum Tax).
However, Pillar 2 has significant indirect implications for multinational enterprises operating locally.
- Expected Effects of Pillar 2
- Groups with operations in Bosnia may need to assess effective tax rate (ETR) for top-up tax obligations in other jurisdictions.
- Bosnia’s current tax systems (10% CIT rate in both entities) may trigger top-up taxes elsewhere once Pillar 2 becomes globally enforced.
- Multinational groups will need:
- enhanced TP documentation,
- stronger substance and control tests,
- robust allocation and risk-management justification.
- Forward Outlook
- Bosnia is expected to gradually align with Pillar 2 due to EU integration goals.
- Large multinational groups are already preparing global minimum tax calculations involving Bosnian subsidiaries.
Transfer Pricing Methods
Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) is preferred when highly similar transactions exist between independent parties.
Best suited for:
- Commodity-based transactions
- Cross-border sales of standardized goods
- Financial transactions (loans, guarantees)
- Royalty rates for comparable IP
Why it’s used:
- CUP provides the closest reflection of market price, but requires high-quality comparable data, which can sometimes be challenging in Bosnia’s market.
Used mainly by distributors and trading companies that purchase goods from related parties and resell them without significant value addition.
Typical use cases:
- Limited-risk distributors
- Wholesale trading entities
- Consumer goods distributors
Bosnia’s tax authorities expect:
- A gross margin analysis
- Proof that the distributor performs no significant manufacturing or enhancement
Applied to companies that provide production or service support to group entities.
- Common applications:
- Contract manufacturers
- Service centers (IT, HR, accounting, logistics)
- Back-office shared services
- Captive service providers
Tax authorities evaluate:
- Cost base accuracy
- Appropriate mark-up supported by benchmarking
The Transactional Net Margin Method is the most commonly applied method due to availability of EU/CEE comparables.
Used for:
- Routine service providers
- Contract manufacturers
- Low-risk distributors
- Shared service centers
Why TNMM is popular:
- ALPs (arm’s length prices) verified via operating margins
- Suitable when product comparability is limited
- Works well in markets with scarce local data
Used when both associated enterprises contribute unique and valuable intangibles or when functions and risks are highly integrated.
Applications include:
- Joint R&D activities
- Integrated service delivery models
- Digital platforms
- IP-heavy operations
Profit Split is suitable where:
- Both parties contribute significant value
- Clear allocation keys (e.g., assets, people, costs) exist
- Traditional methods fail due to unique intangibles
Analytical & Compliance Support
Functional Comparability
Evaluation of:
- Core operational activities (manufacturing, distribution, services)
- Decision-making responsibilities and key personnel
- Value-driving functions (procurement, marketing, logistics, R&D)
Asset Comparability
Assessment includes:
- Tangible assets (machinery, warehouses, vehicles)
- Intangibles (brand, know-how, patents, customer relationships)
- Working capital levels (inventory, receivables, payables)
- Risk Comparability
Matching entities based on:
- Market and demand risk
- Inventory and capacity risk
- Credit and financial risk
- Supply chain and procurement risk
- Foreign exchange exposure
- Economic Circumstances
Consideration of:
- Regional market conditions (Bosnia & Western Balkans)
- Regulatory environment
- Competitive landscape
- Contractual terms
- Data Sources
Since Bosnia & Herzegovina does not maintain its own domestic database, benchmarking analyses typically rely on:
- EU/CEEC comparable company datasets
- Commercial databases (e.g., Amadeus, Orbis)
- Regional industry-specific comparables
- Tax Authority Expectations
- The Indirect Taxation Authority (ITA) expects:
- Transparent selection and rejection of comparables
- Multi-year data analysis
- Clear justification for tested party selection
- Demonstrated alignment with Bosnia’s economic reality
The FAR Analysis (Functions–Assets–Risks) is a core requirement in Bosnia’s Transfer Pricing documentation and forms the foundation of the arm’s length defense.
- Functions Analysis
Key functional areas evaluated include:
- Manufacturing, assembly, or processing services
- Distribution and reseller activities
- Procurement and supply chain management
- Sales, marketing, and customer support functions
Shared services: IT, HR, finance, administration
- R&D and technical support functions
- Assets Analysis
Assessment covers:
Tangible assets:
- Production facilities
- Machinery and tools
- Warehousing and logistics assets
Intangible assets:
- Trademarks, trade names
- Proprietary technology or process know-how
- Customer relationships
- Marketing intangibles
Financial assets:
- Working capital investment
- Capital employed in business operations
- Risk Analysis
Bosnia requires clear identification, allocation, and documentation of risks such as:
- Market and competition risk
- Inventory and capacity utilization risk
- Credit and collection risk
- Supply chain and procurement risk
- Operational risk
- Foreign exchange exposure
- IP commercialization or development risks
- Regulatory Expectations
The tax authority expects FAR analysis to reflect:
- Economic reality over contractual terms
- Control over risks + financial capacity to assume them
- Clear justification for why the selected party is the “tested party”
- Alignment with OECD and EU TP standards
- Industries with High Audit Focus
- Automotive components
- Pharmaceutical and medical suppliers
- Energy and mining
- Logistics and warehousing
- Technology and shared service centers
A robust FAR analysis is crucial for mitigating audit exposure given Bosnia’s increasing TP scrutiny.
Trends, Challenges & Real-World Impacts
Bosnia and Herzegovina faces a unique mix of Transfer Pricing (TP) challenges due to its fragmented governance structure and evolving tax environment.
Key Challenges Fragmented tax administratio
Bosnia’s tax landscape is split across:
- State level
- Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Republika Srpska
- Brčko District
This creates inconsistencies in enforcement, expectations, and documentation reviews.
- Limited availability of local comparables
- There is no domestic TP database, pushing taxpayers to rely on EU/CEEC comparables—often challenged by auditors for differences in market profiles.
- Heightened scrutiny of intra-group service charges
Tax authorities often challenge:
- Management fees
- HQ charges
- Low-value-adding services
- R&D and technical service fees
- They commonly demand evidence of benefit, not just invoices.
- Complex supply chain structures
Automotive, energy, and manufacturing groups rely on cross-border arrangements that require precise FAR analysis and DEMPE mapping.
- Lack of clear safe harbours
- Unlike some EU states, Bosnia provides no safe harbours for routine distribution margins or low-value services.
- Growing focus on intangibles
Bosnia increasingly examines:
- Marketing intangibles
- Contract R&D contributions
- IP ownership vs. actual control over DEMPE functions
Bosnia and Herzegovina is rapidly aligning its TP framework with international best practices, particularly the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.
Major Trends
Increased demand for detailed TP documentation
Authorities expect full compliance aligned with:
- OECD standards
- Regional benchmarks
- Functional/economic justification
- Rising use of TNMM for manufacturing & distribution
Given the lack of local comparables, TNMM is widely preferred for:
- Automotive suppliers
- Retail distributors
- Contract manufacturers
- Shared service centres
- Strong emphasis on DEMPE analysis
Bosnia is mirroring EU-level scrutiny on:
- IP ownership
- Substance
- R&D activities
- Value creation alignment
- Growth in local audits linked to BEPS reforms
Areas with increased audits include:
- Service fees
- Intercompany financing
- Royalty payments
- Limited-risk distribution models
- Push toward modernization of TP legislation
Momentum is growing to unify TP rules across Bosnia’s political entities, driven by:
- EU integration
- International investor pressure
- Regional tax harmonization
Below are the most relevant developments influencing Bosnia’s TP landscape.
Increased TP audit activity
Both the Indirect Taxation Authority (ITA) and entity-level tax offices have expanded their TP audit teams and are focusing on:
- Service fees
- Financial transactions
- Royalty and licensing agreements
- Draft initiatives for unified TP regulations
- Policy discussions are underway to create a single national Transfer Pricing framework, reducing inconsistencies across entities.
- Growing alignment with EU and OECD requirements
Bosnia is progressively integrating elements of:
- BEPS Action Plans
- OECD DEMPE principles
- Detailed benchmarking standards
- TP audits triggered by customs valuation discrepancies
Customs authorities increasingly request TP documentation where intercompany imports are undervalued or show unusual price fluctuations.
Tightening expectations around benchmarking studies
Authorities now expect:
- Transparent comparable selection
- Rejection matrices
- Multiple-year data
- Industry-level justification
Global and regional developments are shaping Bosnia’s economic environment—and directly influencing TP risks and expectations.
- Major Impacts
Supply chain disruptions increasing TP volatility
Manufacturers—especially in automotive, electronics, and metals—face:
- Raw material shortages
- Price inflation
- Cross-border logistics delays
- This challenges the stability of arm’s length margins.
- Currency volatility affecting intercompany pricing
The currency peg limits extreme fluctuations, but regional FX pressures still affect:
- Working capital
- Cross-border funding
- Price-setting models
- Rising cost of capital impacting intra-group loans
Global interest rate hikes have increased scrutiny on:
- Loan pricing
- Debt-to-equity ratios
- Financial guarantee fees
- EU regulatory push accelerating alignment
Bosnia’s EU accession path increases pressure to:
- Adopt stronger TP controls
- Implement BEPS-aligned rules
- Enhance compliance systems
- Political fragmentation slowing tax harmonization
Ongoing governance divides impact:
- Consistency in TP enforcement
- Predictability of tax outcomes
- Clarity in documentation requirements
Use Cases by Business Size & Industry
Startups in Bosnia and Herzegovina often operate in early-stage, high-growth environments with limited resources. Their Transfer Pricing needs tend to focus on clarity, defensibility, and cost-efficient compliance.
- Key Characteristics of Startup TP Profiles
- Reliance on Service-Based TNMM Benchmarking
Most startups engage in routine functions such as:
- software development
- technical support
- shared services
- local distribution
These activities typically justify a TNMM-based low-risk tested party profile.
Support Required For:
- R&D Incentives & Cost Allocation
Startups performing research or software development need:
- cost-sharing clarity
- ownership of resulting IP
- DEMPE-based justification
- Funding Arrangements
Startups often rely on:
- shareholder loans
- convertible notes
- capital injections
These require arm’s-length interest rate and thin-capitalization assessments.
• IP Ownership Structuring
Startups generating early-stage intangible assets must determine:
- where IP is legally owned
- who performs DEMPE functions
- how future royalty flows will be allocated
• Intercompany Service Fees
Typical business support includes:
- management services
- engineering support
- platform development
- Authorities require evidence of benefit, even for small entities.
- Why TP Matters for Startups
Bosnian tax authorities increasingly monitor:
- loss-making entities
- high-growth tech companies
- cross-border digital service arrangements
- A clear Transfer Pricing strategy reduces audit risk as the business scales.
SMEs in Bosnia and Herzegovina form the backbone of the economy, especially in manufacturing, automotive supply, food production, textiles, and logistics. Their Transfer Pricing needs are broader and often more complex than those of startups.
- Key Transfer Pricing Needs for SMEs
- Cost Structure Benchmarking
SMEs frequently act as:
limited-risk distributors
contract manufacturers
service providers
TNMM is typically used, but authorities expect:
multi-year financial analysis
regional comparable sets
strong comparability adjustments
- Cross-Border Supply Chain Structuring
Common for SMEs involved in:
production
assembly
components manufacturing
logistics/warehousing
TP must reflect:
material price fluctuations
subcontracting arrangements
toll manufacturing models
- Intra-Group Financing & Cash Flow Support
SMEs often require:
intercompany loans
guarantee fees
working capital adjustments
interest benchmarking (e.g., CUP, credit rating analysis)
These are frequently audited in Bosnia.
- Royalty and License Fee Rationalization
SMEs using group trademarks or technology must justify:
royalty rates
brand value
DEMPE alignment
economic substance
Authorities often challenge royalty deductions for SMEs.
Compliance with Multi-Entity Requirements
Due to Bosnia’s multi-entity governance structure, SMEs must ensure TP compliance across:
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Republika Srpska
Brčko District
Inconsistencies between tax bodies may trigger TP audits.
Why TP Matters for SMEs
SMEs face:
increasing audit frequency
customs-linked TP reviews
pressure to maintain compliant profit margins
A well-documented TP framework protects against penalties and maintains supply chain stability.
Dispute Resolution & Advance Agreements
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently does not have a formal APA program similar to OECD countries. However, the tax authorities in both entities (Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina & Republika Srpska) allow informal advance consultations and pre-filing discussions that function as early dispute-prevention tools.
How APAs Function Informally in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Pre-Filing Consultations
Businesses may request meetings with the tax authority to:
- present their transfer pricing model
- explain pricing arrangements for key transactions
- justify selection of the tested party
- seek alignment on acceptable Transfer Pricing methods
This reduces risk of future disputes.
- Technical Clarification Letters
Companies can submit a written request for clarification regarding:
- pricing methodologies
- deductibility of service fees
- cross-border financing terms
- royalty and licensing arrangements
While not legally binding, these letters provide strong audit protection.
- Cross-Entity Coordination Challenges
Bosnia and Herzegovina’s tax system is divided across:
- Federation of BiH
- Republika Srpska
- Brčko District
Each has its own tax authority and enforcement approach, so businesses often seek informal alignment separately for each jurisdiction.
Key Sectors Requesting APA-Style Clarification
- automotive and component manufacturing
- pharmaceuticals
- logistics and distribution
- IT/software development
- energy and raw materials
These sectors face higher audit risk due to cross-border supply chains.
- Benefits of APA-Style Engagements
- Reduces risk of Transfer Pricing adjustments
- Provides clarity for long-term business models
- Enhances predictability for MNE investment decisions
- Minimizes potential penalties at audit
Although informal, these engagements function similarly to APAs and are increasingly used by foreign investors.
Bosnia’s tax authorities have become more assertive in Transfer Pricing enforcement. As a result, companies prioritize dispute avoidance strategies to ensure audit readiness and reduce compliance risk.
Key Dispute Avoidance Practices
- Robust Local File Documentation
Authorities expect:
- method selection aligned with OECD Guidelines
- comparability analysis using regional CEE data
- multi-year benchmarking data
- detailed functional (FAR) analysis
- evidence of DEMPE functions for intangibles
Good documentation is critical, as audits focus heavily on compliance gaps.
- Proactive Communication with Tax Authorities
- Before implementing significant cross-border arrangements, companies often seek:
- advance clarifications
- interpretations of TP rules
- validation of intercompany service justifications
- This greatly reduces audit exposure.
- Strengthening Economic Substance
Bosnia emphasizes:
- real decision-making presence
- operational capability
- documented control over risks
Tax authorities challenge “paper entities” lacking local substance.
- Alignment Between Customs and TP Values
Customs authorities frequently review transaction prices for imported goods. Inconsistent values between:
- customs declarations
- Transfer Pricing documentation
can trigger adjustments and penalties. - Consistency Across Entities
Because Bosnia has three taxing jurisdictions, companies must ensure TP positions remain consistent across:
- Federation Porezna Uprava
- Republika Srpska Tax Authority
- Brčko District Tax Authority
Any inconsistency increases the likelihood of review.
- Focus Areas in Recent Audits
Tax audits commonly target:
- management and head-office service fees
- intercompany loans and guarantee fees
- distribution margins
- contract manufacturing structures
- royalty and IP payments
Where documentation is insufficient, tax authorities tend to recharacterize transactions.
Clear, Competitive Packages Tailored for Your Transfer Pricing Needs
Basic Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
Standard Transfer Pricing Study
Premium Transfer Pricing Study
Experienced Transfer Pricing Advisors at Your Service
OECD Transfer Pricing-Country-Profile Bosnia and Herzegovina
This is general information only and not professional advice. Consult a professional before acting.