Iceland Transfer Pricing Policy
Iceland transfer pricing policy – Key Transfer Pricing rules in Iceland, documentation obligations, and compliance expectations under the Directorate of Internal Revenue (RSK).
Please click on each section to expand further:
Introduction to Transfer Pricing in Iceland
Iceland’s transfer pricing framework is governed by the Income Tax Act and related regulations, fully aligned with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. Taxpayers engaging in cross-border transactions with related parties must demonstrate that pricing is consistent with the arm’s-length principle, supported by strong economic substance and defensible documentation. Authorities emphasise accurate functional analysis and appropriate profit allocation for transactions involving goods, services, intangibles, financing, and restructuring activities.
The Icelandic tax authority has intensified enforcement in recent years, placing particular scrutiny on management fees, royalties, intra-group services, and financing arrangements. To maintain compliance, companies must prepare contemporaneous documentation that evidences value creation, supports transfer pricing methodologies, and provides reliable comparability analyses. High-quality documentation not only strengthens tax positions but also reduces exposure to penalties and potential adjustments during audits.
- OECD-Based Guidelines: Iceland follows OECD guidelines for related-party transactions, aligning with global standards to prevent tax avoidance.
- Functional Analysis: A functional analysis (covering functions, assets, and risks, or FAR) is required to determine appropriate transfer pricing.
- Comparability Study: Businesses must conduct a comparability study using internal or external comparables to ensure pricing is in line with market conditions.
- Accepted Methods: The methods include CUP, Resale Minus, Cost Plus, TNMM, and Profit Split, chosen based on the nature of the transactions.
- Documentation: Iceland requires businesses to prepare and maintain detailed transfer pricing documentation to demonstrate compliance.
Iceland’s transfer pricing regulations are designed to prevent aggressive tax avoidance and ensure fair taxation across multinational enterprises.
Local tax authorities in Iceland rigorously enforce transfer pricing laws, and businesses must comply with established rules to avoid penalties.
Iceland’s transfer pricing policies are closely aligned with international practices, especially the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.
Multinational companies with operations in Iceland must ensure their pricing structures meet both local and international standards for compliance.
Documentation & Regulatory Requirements
OECD Guidelines Compliance: Iceland follows the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) guidelines to ensure that multinational enterprises comply with the arm’s-length principle.
Tax Avoidance Prevention: BEPS rules aim to prevent tax avoidance through aggressive transfer pricing strategies that could lead to base erosion.
Reporting Obligations: Icelandic businesses are required to adhere to reporting rules that ensure their transfer pricing practices align with international standards.
Mandatory Reporting: Iceland requires multinational enterprises to file Country-by-Country (CbCR) reports if their annual consolidated revenue exceeds €750 million.
Financial Transparency: CbCR includes key financial data such as profits, taxes paid, and employees per jurisdiction, which helps tax authorities monitor the allocation of profits and risks.
Global Standards: Iceland’s CbCR framework follows OECD recommendations to align with global tax reporting practices.
Regulatory Adherence: Businesses in Iceland must comply with local transfer pricing regulations, ensuring that their intercompany transactions are at arm’s length.
Documentation Requirements: Companies must maintain appropriate documentation to support their transfer pricing policies and methodologies.
Tax Audits: Iceland’s tax authorities rigorously audit transfer pricing documentation to ensure compliance with local laws and OECD guidelines.
Global Minimum Tax: Iceland has adopted the OECD’s Pillar 2 framework, which introduces a global minimum tax rate for large multinational enterprises.
Impact on Multinationals: Companies operating in Iceland must ensure that their effective tax rate meets the minimum threshold set by the OECD, preventing tax avoidance through low-tax jurisdictions.
Alignment with International Standards: Iceland is aligning its tax laws with the global minimum tax initiative to ensure fairer taxation and reduce tax base erosion.
Transfer Pricing Methods
Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP): The CUP method involves comparing the price charged for goods or services in a controlled transaction with those in an uncontrolled transaction between unrelated parties.
Iceland Application: The CUP method is used for transactions where reliable comparables exist, especially in the case of tangible goods or standard services.
Advantages: Provides a direct comparison to the market price, ensuring that transfer prices reflect true arm’s length conditions.
Definition: This method sets the transfer price by subtracting a gross margin from the resale price charged to an independent customer.
Use in Iceland: Commonly used for resellers or distributors of goods, where the reseller does not perform significant value-added activities.
Focus: The method focuses on the resale price, ensuring that the gross margin aligns with market norms.
Methodology: The Cost Plus method adds a mark-up to the cost of producing goods or services to arrive at a transfer price.
Iceland Application: Typically applied to manufacturing transactions or services where costs are clearly identifiable.
Key Consideration: The mark-up should be based on the industry standard and the risks borne by the business.
Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM): The TNMM compares the net profit margin of a controlled transaction to that of comparable uncontrolled transactions.
Use in Iceland: Frequently used when direct price comparables are difficult to find, focusing on profitability rather than price.
Flexibility: This method is flexible and can be applied to a wide range of business models in Iceland.
Definition: The Profit Split method divides the total combined profits of related parties based on their respective contributions to the value created by the transaction.
Iceland Application: Suitable for joint ventures or highly integrated operations where both parties contribute significantly to the business.
Key Benefit: Allows a more accurate allocation of profits in complex business arrangements.
Analytical & Compliance Support
Purpose: A comparability analysis is used to ensure that transfer prices for related-party transactions align with market standards.
Process: Involves comparing the terms of intercompany transactions with those of similar transactions between unrelated entities, using both internal and external comparables.
Key Considerations: Factors such as economic conditions, industry trends, and geographical location are taken into account during the comparability assessment.
Definition: FAR (Functions, Assets, and Risks) analysis evaluates the functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by each party in a related-party transaction.
Purpose: It helps determine an appropriate transfer price based on the contributions of each party to the value created by the transaction.
Application in Iceland: This analysis is essential for identifying the roles of each party and ensuring that the transfer pricing method accurately reflects these contributions.
Trends, Challenges & Real-World Impacts
Regulatory Complexity: The complexity of Iceland’s transfer pricing regulations poses a challenge for businesses, especially with frequent updates and detailed compliance requirements.
Documentation Burden: Maintaining proper documentation to justify transfer pricing policies is a significant challenge, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Audit Risks: Increased scrutiny from tax authorities regarding intercompany pricing can result in audits, leading to potential financial and reputational risks.
Focus on Digital Economy: As with many other countries, Iceland is increasingly focusing on transfer pricing rules related to the digital economy, addressing the tax challenges posed by digital multinational corporations.
Compliance and Automation: There is a trend towards automating compliance processes, leveraging technology to streamline documentation, reduce errors, and improve efficiency.
Global Alignment: Iceland is aligning its policies with OECD guidelines, particularly the BEPS framework, to create a level playing field and combat international tax avoidance.
Regulatory Updates: Iceland has introduced new measures to align its transfer pricing policies with the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) recommendations, focusing on transparency and fair taxation.
Tax Authority Focus: The Icelandic tax authorities have increased their focus on ensuring that businesses correctly apply the arm’s-length principle in their intercompany transactions.
Digital Services Tax: Iceland is exploring ways to tax digital services more effectively, especially targeting global tech companies operating within the country.
OECD Pillar 2: The adoption of the OECD’s global minimum tax (Pillar 2) is set to influence Iceland’s tax policy and transfer pricing strategies, particularly for multinational enterprises.
Global Trade and Economic Shifts: Economic shifts and trade disruptions impact Iceland’s transfer pricing practices, especially with regards to cross-border transactions and pricing adjustments.
Policy Adjustments: Ongoing global policy changes, including digital tax reforms and environmental taxation, will influence Iceland’s approach to transfer pricing in the coming years.
Use Cases by Business Size & Industry
Startups in Iceland must ensure that intra-group transactions—particularly those involving technology development, IP creation, and early-stage financing—adhere to the arm’s-length principle.
Icelandic tax authorities place strong emphasis on economic substance, requiring startups to clearly document who performs development, enhancement, maintenance, protection, and exploitation (DEMPE) functions.
Cost-sharing arrangements, founder loans, and intercompany service fees must include defensible benchmarking to avoid recharacterisation or adjustments.
Startups operating across borders must prepare contemporaneous Transfer Pricing documentation to substantiate value creation and prevent penalties during audits.
As many Icelandic startups scale internationally, authorities expect robust comparability analysis to support intercompany prices—especially for SaaS, digital services, and IP transfers.
Early implementation of compliant Transfer Pricing models helps startups minimise risk exposure, attract investment, and maintain operational flexibility as they expand globally.
SMEs engaged in cross-border activities must meet Iceland’s Transfer Pricing requirements, including maintaining documentation that supports arm’s-length pricing for goods, services, royalties, and financing transactions.
For SMEs, Icelandic authorities provide no simplified regime—compliance expectations mirror OECD standards, making proper analysis and documentation critical.
Intra-group service arrangements are a common risk area; SMEs must demonstrate clear benefit tests, cost allocation logic, and benchmarking of service fees.
SMEs that operate distribution, manufacturing, or shared-service functions must maintain accurate functional analysis to support their Transfer Pricing positions.
Financing arrangements—such as related-party loans or guarantees—must include market-based interest benchmarking to comply with Iceland’s increasing scrutiny on financial transactions.
Strong Transfer Pricing governance helps SMEs avoid disputes, maintain predictable tax outcomes, and support long-term strategic growth, especially when entering European or Nordic markets.
Dispute Resolution & Advance Agreements
Definition: APAs are agreements between a taxpayer and the Icelandic tax authorities to determine the transfer pricing methods for future intercompany transactions.
Benefits: APAs provide certainty and reduce the risk of transfer pricing adjustments by setting clear guidelines for pricing methods and tax positions.
Procedure: To obtain an APA in Iceland, businesses must submit detailed documentation and proposals outlining their intercompany transactions and transfer pricing methods.
Proactive Measures: Businesses can avoid transfer pricing disputes in Iceland by maintaining thorough and accurate documentation, following OECD guidelines, and aligning with local tax laws.
Early Engagement with Tax Authorities: Proactively engaging with the Icelandic tax authorities can help resolve potential issues before they escalate into disputes.
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Iceland offers a range of mechanisms for resolving transfer pricing disputes, including mutual agreement procedures (MAP) and administrative reviews.
Clear, Competitive Packages Tailored for Your Transfer Pricing Needs
Basic Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
Standard Transfer Pricing Study
Premium Transfer Pricing Study
Experienced Transfer Pricing Advisors at Your Service
OECD Transfer Pricing-Country-Profile Iceland
This is general information only and not professional advice. Consult a professional before acting.